Santos storms out of council meeting

Gabe Santos, Longmont City Council 2012

Bullying his fellow council members isn't working.

Council Member Gabe Santos stormed out of the February 21 council meeting when things didn’t go his way.  I could say “like a bully in a china shop,” but council is far from that delicate status, though certainly the moniker of bully is apropos Santos.  After all, someone had to fill ex-Mayor Bryan Baum’s shoes.  Longmont can’t have a city council absent at least one right-wing bully.

So what got his knickers is such a tight twist.  Senate Bill 12-015, the ASSET bill, which provides for standard-rate tuition for undocumented foreign students who have spent at least three years in a Colorado high school and have applied for admission within one year of graduation or completing the GED.  In addition to the in-state tuition, the student would be required to pay the opportunity fund stipend that is offered to in-state students. How dare the city help it’s young people pull themselves up by their bootstraps!

In order for the Longmont City Council to vote on endorsing SB-015 during a study session, it was necessary to suspend Council’s Rule of Procedure 17.5. Mayor Dennis Coombs made the motion, seconded by Sarah Levison, and that prompted Santos to go ballistic.

He put his ever-so-oppressive foot down and said, “I’m not going to vote for this. If we’re going to bring up potentially contentious items before council at the state or federal level, then I got a whole slew that we can bring up.”  He ranted and raved about precedent, about future votes on drilling in the Gulf of Mexico or saving the trees in Afghanistan.

In response, Mayor Coombs explained that the bill is largely bi-partisan and that Longmont has a number of Hispanic students.  That triggered even more raving by Santos who accused the mayor of making it a race issue.  Mr. Santos, do you have a problem with being Latino/Hispanic?  Or do you have to prove to the right-wing racists in the community that you’re one of the acceptable ones?  If you’re paying attention you will know that there are many racists in Longmont who consistently spew their racist venom in comments to Times-Call articles whenever the opportunity presents itself, or even in Letters to the Editor.

Santos didn’t get any help from Council Member Brian Bagley either.  Bagley pointed out that council gives direction to staff about which state bills to support or oppose and once or twice a month offers proclamations on issues that are often beyond the scope of the city’s direct business.

The hilarious portion of Santos tirade was his statement about the Council being a non-partisan board.  Technically, he’s correct.  But most Longmont voters know what party their council members belong to.  And if they don’t know it by a candidate’s admission, history or information supplied by their friends and family, they know it by the platforms the candidate adopts and by who are the visible endorsers.  So once more, of the countless upon countless times, Council Member Santos is – how shall I say this politely – DISINGENUOUS.

Disingenuous?  Aw, let’s forget that one.  Council member Santos repeatedly (let me say that again – repeatedly) couches his arguments fer or agin a matter with supposedly acceptable or righteous reasons.  He does this to avoid a record that could cause damage downstream in his political pursuits. Hell, even Tom DeLay wasn’t slick enough for that.  But then he was a Republican partisan with a major position in the Republican-led House of Representatives at the time.  While in the employ of Representatives Tom DeLay and Roy Blunt, I’m sure Santos had ample opportunity to learn how to be slicker than the supposed “Slick Willie,” whom they tried so desperately to throw out of office. They’re using other tactics this time around with Obama, but that’s subject for a different article.

A vote was taken on the motion to suspend Procedure 17.5 and the result was 6-1;  Santos was the LONE dissenter.  Following that Mayor Coombs moved and it was seconded that the Council instruct Sandi Seader, the city’s lobbyist, to convey the City of Longmont’s endorsement of SB-015 to the Colorado Senate and House.  Again, the vote was 6-1 with Santos as the LONE dissenter.  While Santos may have strengthened his right-wing, anti-immigrant, anti-Hispanic credentials with Longmont voters when he tries to climb the ladder out of Longmont into state office, he’s left one helluva stench elsewhere.

Immediately following both votes and before the routine comments from council members, the city manager and city attorney, Santos stormed from the council chambers.  He didn’t get his way.  He didn’t have the support of other council members whom he “whips” (bullies) into shape lest they stray from the fold.  He was left hanging out to dry all by his LONEsome.

What is council member Santos going to do next week for a second act?  We’ll just have to stay tuned, won’t we?

  2 comments for “Santos storms out of council meeting

  1. TF
    February 22, 2012 at 9:12 pm

    Equally significant (and quite appalling) was Santos’ NO vote on the “designated outside activity areas.” To me, his voting NO means: It’s okay to poison 1) the kids on the playground (doesn’t he have children?); 2) people riding their bikes on the greenway, 3) families playing softball at any of the parks, etc. With gas wells located right next door, families and their pets will be exposed to toxic and carcinogenic VOCs and the B-tex’s (xylene, benzene, etc.), escaping during the frack and afterward from condensate tanks. And this doesn’t even include spills of fracking fluid, a more common occurrence than the COGGCC will admit (although it’s their data that indicts them – they should be arrested for negligence).

    Speaking of the COGCC, Attorney Matter is the king of arrogance (he loves to hear himself talk speaking from his throne – and he brought along one of his disciples to speak during PITBH (an oil and gas industry rep). I think karma is gonna catch up with Matter and co.

    I say let ’em drill in Santos’ backyard – and then we’ll see if he changes his tune. Spill-baby-spill in his backyard.

  2. Gregory Iwan
    February 27, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    I hope that people elected by the entire City (Mr. Santos’s seat, for example, is “at large”) will always seek to scrupulously abide by their oath of office and serve faithfully and diligently unless illness or an unavoidable and very significant conflict temporarily prevents it. What is significant? Things like death in the immediate family, serious injury endured by a child, etc. Any of the people’s servants who choose not to otherwise provide full-time allegiance, whether the topic at hand is pleasant or not, should evaluate their choice of position. That’s one man’s two cents. And now you know one reason why I choose not to have CATV and so to have the capability to watch Channel 8. I don’t need another case of shingles.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *