Longmont voters entitled to Home Rule

Editor’s Note: Gordon Pedrow served as Longmont City Manger for 18 years prior to his retirement in March of 2012.

Nov. 6 is Election Day. Be sure to cast your ballot for the sake of your city, county, state and nation. Tucked in amongst the myriad partisan races is Longmont Ballot Question 300. This question is worthy of your careful scrutiny because it is a proposed charter amendment.

Is this what you want in Longmont?

Ballot Question 300 deserves careful attention for several reasons: It will amend the city charter, it is an important public health and quality-of-life issue, and it was initiated by thousands of your friends and neighbors. Usually, we look to the City Council to appropriately act to protect citizens from negative impacts of heavy industrial activity. However, when a majority of our elected representatives fail to carry out their responsibilities, the city charter and state constitution provide means by which the citizens can initiate actions they believe necessary to protect their community.

Beginning last November, the City Council studied how best to regulate the negative impacts of oil and gas operations within Longmont. This is an industry that is poorly regulated and coddled by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC), the state agency charged with regulating its operations in order to protect public health and the environment. Until June, when it came time for the City Council to adopt its comprehensive regulations, it appeared that most council members were in favor of acting to protect the community from oil and gas operations. However, at the last moment, under extreme pressure from the industry’s big-money lobbyists and state politicians, a majority of the City Council capitulated to the industry and refused to support comprehensive regulations. When it really counted, only Mayor Coombs and council members Levison and Bagley were willing to adopt adequate comprehensive regulations to protect Longmont residents. Most citizens would agree that an appropriately regulated oil and gas industry can be a win for everyone.

After it became obvious that the City Council majority would approve only a weak, watered-down set of regulations, a group of citizens opted to circulate petitions to amend the charter as proposed in Ballot Question 300. More than 8,000 citizens signed the petitions. All registered voters can now have a direct say in the outcome of the proposed amendment.

This issue deserves your careful attention now for a couple of reasons. First, you need to understand what it says so that you can assess whether or not it reflects what is best for our community. Second, you should examine the merits of the amendment prior to the misinformation tsunami that will soon be launched by the oil and gas industry, along with affiliated special interests, as they try to persuade you to vote no on 300. (Do you remember the hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of propaganda our community received from the cable industry when Longmont voters were considering home-rule control of telecommunication matters?) I encourage all residents to study the issues early so that you can adequately assess the veracity of information provided by both sides. Because the citizens who initiated the proposed amendment will have meager resources, it will no doubt be a very lopsided campaign.

It is easy to anticipate a few attack lines you can expect to hear from the well-funded opposition. These include: The industry will sue; Longmont has a representative form of government, so it is a City Council matter; the COGCC adequately regulates the oil and gas industry; and finally, Colorado has the most stringent oil and gas regulations in the nation.

As the attack ads appear, consider the following questions: Do you want to capitulate just because a multi-billion-dollar industry wants to resist adequate regulation and threatens to sue if it fails to get its way? If a majority of our elected representatives fail to protect our health, safety and the environment, doesn’t the city charter and state constitution provide a means for citizens to act? If the COGCC regulations are adequate, why did the governor on Aug. 15 tell the industry that new regulations are necessary for the industry’s “integrity and trust” and that citizens’ concerns about fracking must be addressed? Finally, do we care how stringent Colorado regulations are if they do not adequately protect public health, safety and the environment? Just last month, the governor admitted the state’s regulations are not adequate.

Voters, the issue belongs to you. Do your homework and cast your ballot.

  2 comments for “Longmont voters entitled to Home Rule

  1. Gregory Iwan
    September 3, 2012 at 10:48 am

    This is priceless. So measured, so cogent. Not at all a strident attack on anybody. Should be framed and presented at our high schools.

    The captains of the petroleum industry and those who do their bidding ought to understand that if drilling were conducted only in the manner it was, say, in the 1930s (single, vertical hole), WITH TIGHT EMISSION AND DISPOSAL CONTROLS, many people might not mind such activity, even “near” their back yard. But, in the Harvard Business School kind of drive to accumulate ever more $$$$$, “EFFICIENCY” rears its head, and “NEW technology” comes into play. Hence, the application of multiple, hydrofractured, horizontally or directionally drilled wells from a single pad. And we don’t need the externalities involved.

    Ain’t it funny that no matter what is done by the corporate mavens these days, it’s always the ordinary, “little” guy who pays, be it from a degraded environment, a more costly life, a reduced income, a risky or nonexistent retirement stipend, an empty chair at the dinner table once occupied by the son who dies as a Marine aiming to obtain MORE (oil, metals, influence, whatever), or even so mundane a thing as the insane (over)packaging of this or that product needing a blowtorch and an ounce of C-4 to open. Then what?! Everyone should visit a landfill sometime. THAT is QUITE educational. But everything comes from a supermarket shelf, right? Or a cell phone.

    Pogo, we have met the enemy. And MUCH of the time he is us. When he isn’t, he’s the corporate Sumo wrestler with one hand in YOUR pocket and the other around your throat.

    DAMN! I wish Pedrow would run for Congress.

  2. September 4, 2012 at 12:41 am

    It’s our families, our homes – our lives. We have the right and we should fight for it. Thank you Mr. Pedrow for speaking out.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *