Historical

Authoritarian Conservatives: An Analysis

Decades ago scientists wanted to know why the people of Germany and Italy were tolerating, even if they were not supporting, Hitler and Mussolini. And thus the study of authoritarianism began. They also wanted to know if blind allegiance could develop in the United States. After more than a half century of study the answers are in.

For several decades Bob Altmeyer, an American scholar at the University of Manitoba, has been a tireless and dedicated researcher. According to the Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, Altmeyer’s work “powerfully predicts a wide rang of political, social, ideological and intergroup phenomena.” Altmeyer’s work is largely directed at other psychologists and social scientists. He has undertaken hundreds of experiments and his work is reliable and valid according to Paul Nesbitt-Larking reporting in Political Psychology in 2004. His work goes the distance in understanding conservatism.

In an article titled “What Happens When Authoritarians Inherit the Earth? A simulation,” Altmeyer explains that, “When I started out, and ever since, I was not looking for political conservatives. I was looking for people who overtly submit to the established authorities in their lives, who could be of any political/economic/religious stripe.” His work identified “right-wing authoritarians” but he was not using the term “right-wing” in the political sense. Rather he used the designation in a psychological sense.

But as he continued his work he reports that “it turns out that in North America persons who score highly on my measure of authoritarianism test tend to favor right-wing political parties and have ‘conservative’ economic philosophies and religious sentiments.” He goes on to say that this empirical finding has been repeatedly duplicated in his continuing studies and has been replicated in studies by others.

The extensive research on the behavior and personality characteristics of right-wing authoritarians and conservatives concludes that they are people who do not see themselves as they actually are and have little facility for self-analysis.

The research demonstrates that conservatives delight in hurling invectives against their enemies and often prove to have the thinnest of skins if the same is done to them. Many conservatives are unaware of their illogical, contradictory and hypocritical thinking. And if they are forced to address it, either rationalize it away, fail to care, or go on the attack against those who reveal their human weaknesses.

John W. Dean, after studying the works of Altmeyer and others, reports in his book Conservatives Without Conscience that because such thinking is the reality of contemporary conservatism, anyone who operates from a logical mind, or has an inclination for reasoned judgment, is problematic for them.

The work of New York University of professor John T. Jost and his collaborators reveals that those who are or become political conservatives have various psychological attributes such as fear, intolerance of ambiguity, need for certainty or structure in life, overreaction to threats, and a disposition to dominate others.

This data was collected from conservatives, through various testing techniques, who agreed to explain their beliefs and have their psychological dynamics studied. According to the work of Jost and his colleagues, these characteristics typically cannot be ascribed to liberals.

Altmeyer’s studies of authoritarian behavior reveal that the behavior is frequently malicious and mean-spirited and that it is often not expressed for some political purpose but engaged in for the pure pleasure of it. He found that for most right-wingers it was difficult to talk about any subject about which they felt strongly without attacking others. He goes on to reveal that it is their remarkable self-righteousness that keeps them living in an “attack mode.” They are convinced that they are right and are bursting with indignations and a desire to slap down their enemies.

And who are their enemies? Research indicates that these conservatives are defined by what they oppose. And what they oppose is anything and everything that they perceive to be liberal. “Liberal” includes not only Democrats or those who identify themselves as liberal but anyone with whom they disagree. For decades the enemy of communism united them. They require the power of negative thinking and common enemies to unite them.

“Probably about 20 to 25 percent of the adult American population is so right-wing authoritarian, so scared, so self-righteous, so ill-informed, and so dogmatic that nothing you can say or do will change their minds,” said Altmeyer, adding that “they would march America into a dictatorship and probably feel that things had improved as a result.”

Professor Robert O. Paxton observed in his “Anatomy of Fascism” that a “fascism of the future…need not resemble classical fascism perfectly in its outward signs and symbols.” Because of these right-wing authoritarians, authoritarian followers, and social and religious dominators, a new American fascism may have already arrived

This article first appeared July 17, 2008 on YouHub.com Longmont.

Right in your backyard

From the Southern Poverty Law Center

Name
Type
City
Aryan Nations Revival
Christian Identity
Creativity Movement
Neo-Nazi
Denver County
Family Research Institute
Anti-Gay
Colorado Springs
Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints
General Hate
Mancos
Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints
General Hate
Florence
Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints
General Hate
Cotopaxi
Fundamentalist Latter Day Saints
General Hate
Custer County
Knights of the Nordic Order
Neo-Nazi
MSR Productions
Racist Music
Wheat Ridge
Nation of Islam
Black Separatist
Denver
National Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
Ku Klux Klan
Olathe
National Socialist Movement
Neo-Nazi
Hudson
Nationalist Coalition
Neo-Nazi
Denver
New Century Productions – A Conversation About Race
White Nationalist
Littleton
Rescue Without Borders
Anti-Immigrant
Boulder
Scriptures for America Ministries
Christian Identity
Laporte
United Northern and Southern Knights of the Ku Klux Klan
Ku Klux Klan
Longmont
Loading data…

Klan glossary

AKIA: A password meaning “A Klansman I Am”, often seen on decals and bumper stickers.

Alien: A person who does not belong to the Klan.

AYAK?: A password meaning “Are You a Klansman?”

CA BARK: A password meaning “Constantly Applied By All Real Klansmen.”

CLASP: A password meaning “Clannish Loyalty A Sacred Principle.”

Genii: The collective name for the national officers. Also known as the Kloncilium, or the advisory board to the Imperial Wizard.

Hydras: The Real officers, with the exception of the Grand Dragon.

Imperial Giant: Former Imperial Wizard.

Imperial Wizard: The overall, or national, head of a Klan, which it sometimes compares to the president of the United States.

Inner Circle: Small group of four or five members who plan and carry out “action.” Its members and activities are not disclosed to the general membership.

Invisible Empire: A Ku Klux Klan’s overall geographical jurisdiction, which it compares to the United States although none exist in every state.

Kalendar: Klan calendar, which dates events from both the origin and its 1915 rebirth Anno Klan, and means “in the year of the Klan,” and is usually written “AK.”

Kardinal Kullors: White, crimson, gold and black. Secondary Kullors are grey, green and blue. The Imperial Wizard’s Kullor is Skipper Blue.

K.B.I.: Klan Bureau of Investigation.

KIGY!: A password meaning “Klansman, I greet you!”

Klankfraft: The practices and beliefs of the Klan.

Klanton: The jurisdiction of a Klavern.

Klavern: A local unit or club; also called “den.”

Kleagle: An organizer whose main function is to recruit new members. In some Klans, he gets a percentage of the initiation fees.

Klectokon: Initiation fee.

Klepeer: Delegate elected to Imperial Klonvokation.

Klonkave: Secret Klavern meeting.

Klonverse: Province convention.

Kloran: Official book of Klan rituals.

Klorero: Realm convention.

SAN BOG: A password meaning “Strangers Are Near, Be On Guard.”

Terrors: The Exalted Cyclops’ officers.

Thank you Ms. Markey

Sunday, Congress passed the most important reform to America’s health care system since Medicare in the 1960s. After years of fierce debate, 14 months of intense GOP misinformation and hundreds of millions of dollars spent in opposition by industry lobbyists, health care is finally coming to all Americans —and peace of mind to millions more about the health care they already receive.

The health reform bill President Obama signed into law is not perfect, but it does reign in the worst excesses and abuses by greedy insurance companies.

While several of these reforms will take time being fully implemented, many major benefits take effect immediately.  Three of the 18 immediate provisions include; no denying coverage to children with pre-existing medical conditions, eliminating annual and lifetime limits on coverage, and new tax credits for small businesses offering health insurance to employees.  This landmark bill also immediately requires 80% of premium payments go to actual medical costs, not desk jobs, executive bonuses and additional profits.  Premiums can only go up if medical costs go up.

My 88-year-old father, who has great health care coverage thanks to Medicare and VA benefits, tearfully told me he’s grateful he’s lived to see Health Insurance Reform legislation pass.  I’m grateful also.

Thanks to all the brave representatives who recognized the critical need for reform by voting to support this historic bill.  Specific thanks to Congresswoman Betsy Markey, for voting her conscience, putting people before politics and insurance industry profits. This courage is truly what makes our country great.

Longmont’s Hidden 100

Longmont's oldest political syndicate?

The Spartans had their 300, Longmont has its 100 – but Longmont’s tiny army has a bit of an advantage: they never have to show their faces to the ‘enemy’. These are real ‘heroes’ – people who ‘support their candidates wholeheartedly’ but live in horror of ‘retribution’ and that they might be ‘exposed’.

I doubt these folks are afraid of anything but an IRS audit or their proctologist.

This fine group donated no less then $6269.61* to the Western Tradition Partnership, a viciously hard-core right wing partisan group from Montana associated with Scott Gessler, now a candidate for Colorado Secretary of State – just like Ken Blackwell in Ohio. Original document filing
* does anyone see the pattern of 6s in that figure?)

All this money was spent by one hundred Longmont residents who don’t believe the majority should have any rights at all – to them it’s all about money and power and to hell with the ‘little people.’ They managed to cover the town with political toilet paper that activated the far-right factions and disgusted the left to the point of not voting – much to the glee of the people who decried low turnouts during the last election.

We’d love to hear from anyone that can help us identify Longmont’s Comehere Rouge Guerrillas** and help bring them out of the mists of secrecy into the light of day – and I’m NOT talking about the way the Times-Call plays fast and loose with the political process.

(** it’s a joke, for all you humor-impaireds out there)

Light of Day

Is that Katie?

Shining a light on the issue

Sometimes it’s just so hard to keep the truth from seeing the light of day.   The “local” daily newspaper just couldn’t help itself.  Try as it (he) may to avoid telling the truth — or at least the whole story — it just has to do a little crowing about Longmont’s long political history and the playbook that describes the long-standing “local” mission statement.

Going rogue, going rouge, going red, going, going, GONE.

“Local politics — and isn’t all politics local? — is always about quid pro quo.”

Ahh yes, quid pro quo.  Mustn’t forget Longmont’s political heritage.

Heaven Fest: A Briefing

HEAVEN FEST: A BRIEFING FOR THE COUNCIL AND THE LONGMONT COMMUNITY

March 7, 2010 (Photo and story about 2009 event)

Kaye Fissinger

Several of us will be speaking to you this evening about the many aspects of the Heaven Fest rock concert planned for the area around Union Reservoir.

We are well aware that certain council members have taken the position that the matter is an administrative decision and not a matter for the council. Although Use Permit procedures are delineated in the city’s municipal code, the Heaven Fest event is beyond the scope ever imagined by that permitting process.

First and foremost, a decision to hold an event drawing 30,000 to 50,000 attendees rises to the level of a Council policy decision. An approval to move forward with this event should have been answered in a formal motion and vote by the city council before staff time was committed.

The Longmont community is entitled to an up or down vote on the appropriateness of this event at the reservoir. We need to know the position of each and every member of this council on this matter. Beyond this current issue, the City of Longmont must develop policy positions that are venue specific. This is not a policy decision of the Longmont Area Visitors Association. It is an issue for the people of Longmont.

Last Friday City Clerk Valeria Skitt forwarded the city’s list of requirements to Mr. Bodley for his concurrence or further input. However, the conditions that city staff has required of the applicant have not been made available to the public so that it can assess the adequacy of the requirements.

When members of the community became aware of this event, they began to speak out and plead with this council to deny the permit. They have come before this council at Public Invited to be Heard. They have written emails to the mayor and council members, and to city staff. They have written Letters to the Editor denouncing the use of the reservoir for this purpose. They’ve written Guest Opinions . The Longmont Ledger and the Boulder Weekly have reported on the event and its potential negative impacts. Church members have spoken against the concert at the reservoir. The Boulder County Audubon Society has written the mayor, council and city officials warning of the degradation to wildlife and the environment.

So this evening we will break down our concerns and our conclusions about the many aspects of this event that are not in the best interest of the of Longmont. We will talk about wildlife and its habitat. We will talk about other environmental impacts. We will talk about traffic. We will talk about quality of life issues. And, yes, we will talk about economic impact, a believable economic impact.

Kelli Willis

Beyond the code requirements for issuing a use permit, there are other legal documents that have a bearing on this issue.

The Lease Agreement between the City of Longmont and the Union Reservoir Company cover fourteen acres of land on the south side of the reservoir that are devoted to the Union Reservoir District Park and Recreation Area. This agreement requires the city to use due diligence to secure the compliance by the public or other users with any rules or regulations. The city’s decisions are subject to review and comment by the Union Reservoir Company.

The irony of this situation is that the city IS the Union Reservoir for all intents and purposes. The city owns an 86% interest in the reservoir and Ken Husen, the city’s Water Resources Manager, is the President of the Union Reservoir Company Board. It’s effectively asking the city if the city is in agreement with the city on issues involving Union Reservoir. At times that can be very advantageous to Longmont. In this case, it abrogates any genuine checks and balances.

The lease agreement, however, does demand that the city must in no way interfere or impede the operation of the premises as an irrigation reservoir in any manner.

It further states that the city “shall enforce such restrictions and limitations (such as to number of people at the reservoir, number of campers at the reservoir…at one time) to promote safe usage of the reservoir.

A reasonable reading of these clauses requires that the city prevent crowds inside the District Park of even a fraction of the number of people expected at the rock concert – both for reasons of safety and for reasons of maintaining the quality of the water contained in the reservoir.

Staff has sought to excuse the volume of people expected stating that the Union Reservoir District Park has annual attendance of around 150,000 people. Let’s be clear, that is 150,000 people over the course of an entire year, 365 days. There has never been a crowd larger than 6,000 people and that occurred only once. The typical crowd is 600 people during the triathlon. 600 hundred is a long way from 6,000 or possibly 16,000.

And it should also be recognized that the land to the south and that to the east slopes towards the reservoir. There are irrigation ditches along the edge of the field that could fall victim to any number of contaminants. And one of them discharges into the reservoir.

Daria Leverne

Throughout the process of allocating areas for various event purposes there have been times where legally designated open space has been assigned usages that are prohibited by ordinance passed by the people, not by the council. Those purposes cannot be overridden by either staff or council. Since the plans have not been shared with the public, we do not have certainty that open space will be properly used.

Ordinance requires that open space shall be limited to six functions. The most relevant amongst them is the first designated function: “Preservation of natural areas, wildlife habitat, wetlands, agriculture and visual corridors

At various times open space has been designated for use as parking or for use as a helicopter port, neither of which is permitted. Once inside the District Park and near open space, there is nothing that would prevent attendees from wandering into open space in large numbers without regard to preservation .

The Union Reservoir Land Management Implementation Plan governs the Koester Property and the Pietrzak Property. Although it allows for recreational use as a secondary permitted function, it delineates by example usages that are very different from the planned uses by Heaven Fest. The management plan speaks to uses for archery , dog training and a BMX bike course.

Any of these uses are far different from seven stages, massive vehicles delivering equipment, and numerous vendors . The property will hold up to 50,000 people at one time and for many hours. After all, the purpose for being there is to listen to the music. This event is a conceptual stretch way beyond the language of the Land Management Plan.

And lastly, there are the conditions of the Use of Public Places permit itself.

I have heard staff claim that none of the conditions require that a permit be denied. If that is not the case, then why, for Heaven’s sake, even have conditions. If all the city must do is “consider” the conditions, then are we to consider whether the votes in the last election are binding and then ignore them? Are we to consider our utility bills and then fail to pay them?

To the contrary, the code does, in fact, require a finding that the conditions not be violated. It clearly states that “the city clerk and the chief building official SHALL ONLY ISSUE PERMITS upon finding that the permit WILL NOT GENERATE ANY OF THE CONDITIONS specified.

Amongst the provisions specified in the portion of the municipal code covering use permits are issues of public access, noise, health and safety, crowding, and damage of property in light of previous uses, current conditions, or future uses.

Judy Lubow

You’ve seen pictures of people and cars at last year’s Heaven Fest outside Brighton in the Times-Call. The event was held on property owned by Northern Hills Christian Church. Several of us actually visited the location. The land is raw and uncultivated.

We also met with John Jukkola, who was quoted in the Times-Call article “How heavenly was it?” It was important for us to hear first hand and unfiltered a description of what occurred and the reactions of neighbors.

Mr. Jukkola spoke freely; and when asked why he was eager to share his experience and views, he emphatically replied, (quote) “Heaven Fest is too big to be held in a field. It belongs in a stadium.” (end quote) He hopes that the message will sink in and that Heaven Fest will move its event away from the church property and away from Union Reservoir and hold it in a venue such as Dick’s Sporting Goods Park.

Mr. Jukkola is the only one amongst his neighbors willing to speak publicly against the event because his neighbors are extremely concerned that if Longmont declines the Heaven Fest permit, then the Heaven Fest rock concert will return to the church grounds with even larger attendance. They pray (and there is no pun intended) that this will not happen.

Mr. Jukkola is emphatic that there are serious “quality of life issues for people around the festival.”

We were told that in 2008 when the event was first held that traffic on State Highway 7 was so severely backed up that Colorado Department of Transportation threatened to close it down if it happened again in 2009. As a consequence, Heaven Fest instructed 2009 attendees not to Google directions but to use those provided on their website in hopes of avoiding a repetition of the 2008 experience.

People being people, they elected to make their own choices. Two-lane dirt roads near the event where congested. Five of the six miles of area roads around the event are dirt roads. There was a two-mile backup on Colorado Boulevard. And in spite of the warning from CDOT in 2008, 168th Street and Colorado 7 were plugged.

There were three and a half hours of very intense traffic seeking access to the event. And when the roads weren’t congested, speed limits were ignored. And vehicles broke down and were left at the side of road. The attendance in 2009 was 23,000. 2010 expects 30,000 to 50,000.

Teresa Lichti

Private property was leased for two parking lots. Mr. Jukkola, who took the photo appearing in the Times-Call, reported that what was depicted reflected only half of the parked cars in the designated lots. Nevertheless, parking was insufficient.

People parked across the way in the Eagle Shadow subdivision of expensive homes, even though the event organizers had assured the association that there would be no problem. Residents took it upon themselves to prevent entry to the degree that they could.

People parked along Colorado 7 and walked the rest of the way, sometimes four abreast. They parked in oil well areas.

The land leased for parking was purchased for its investment value. The owners plan to capitalize on future development. The land is raw and doesn’t require revegetation. What grass that existed was killed and noxious weeds will now proliferate.

The land around Union Reservoir that is to be used for parking, whether Longmont-owned or privately-owned, is prime farmland, not raw dirt. It will require reseeding; and seed will need to be drilled into the soil. Heaven Fest has no qualifications to mitigate this.

And then there are the issues of dust and noise. The dust was so severe in 2008 and wind conditions so unfavorable that it wasn’t until the following afternoon that the dust cleared. It was necessary for those in the area to keep their windows tightly shut and their air conditioners running in order to cope with the environmental breathing hazards. Winds fortunately prevented a recurrence in 2009.

Assurances by Mr. Bodley about noise levels notwithstanding, Eagle Shadow residents could hear the music; and some found this an unacceptable intrusion on their quality of life. Will Longview also find this to be the case? Certainly the homes near to the event will experience the sound.

Mr. Bodley likes to equate noise levels with highway traffic. This dismissive statement fails to recognize the continuous level of sound that results from an all-day concert. Decibel levels were taken in 2009 in several places between 1 PM and 10 PM on the day of the main concert. The decibel level peaked between 6PM and 7 PM at 85 decibels. The levels ranged from 53 to 85 decibels with the preponderance of levels in the 60s. The loudest levels were recorded in the evening. And remember this is continuous. Music to some. Noise to others.

Jackie Petersen

The Boulder County Chapter of the Audubon Society recently sent a letter to the Longmont City Council and staff raising environmental issues about the proposed Heaven Fest mega-festival planned for the Union Reservoir this summer. As a Chapter member, I have seen both the letter and Longmont’s response. I remain concerned that Longmont is going ahead with the Heaven Fest permit regardless of the environmental issues raised.

The Audubon letter expressed concern about Heaven Fest’s bringing in as many as 50,000 people into the District Park along the south shore of the Reservoir. The City’s response was to say that the site of the concert is not a District Park and thus is not governed by District Park or Open Space guidelines.

Unfortunately, this is only a half truth and thus misleading. The bulk of the Heaven Fest concert is to take place on City farm land immediately south of the District Park, although one stage, concert amenities, and a skateboarding event are planned inside the Park. The reality is that the permit application is for use of the entire Reservoir, specifically including the District Park.

Heaven Fest wants to use our beautiful Reservoir – that is one of the primary reasons they applied for this permit in the first place.

The Strategy Section of the Longmont Area Comprehensive Plan, Section P-1.1(c), states that our District Parks are primarily to promote low-impact, passive outdoor recreation. Even if each of the 30,000 to 50,000 expected Heaven Fest patrons promises only to pirouette through the District Park on their tippy-toes, no one can reasonably argue that such a massive onslaught of people amounts to low-impact, passive recreational use.

Polly Christensen

Union Reservoir is one of the most productive habitats for nesting and migratory birds in eastern Colorado; it’s a rare jewel. This is how many residents feel about Union Reservoir. Many have expressed their concern over the use of the reservoir, as far back as 1989. Over the years, the concern for wildlife at Union Reservoir has not abated.

On February 8, 2010, City Council received a letter from the Boulder County Audubon Society about Heaven Fest being held at the reservoir. Audubon wrote: “Such an important wildlife resource seems a particularly inappropriate place to stage a festival attended by 30,000 to 50,000 people, especially during a time when breeding birds are still feeding dependent young.” So what is the concern about wildlife at the reservoir? More than 200 bird species have been observed at Union Reservoir. There have been reported sightings of 44 species of waterfowl and wading birds, 26 species of shorebirds, including rare species; and 20 raptor species.

Heaven Fest will have adverse impacts, through dust, noise and general disturbance, on these species and the overall quality of the habitat. Birds nesting within the district park area and foraging along the southern shoreline will be directly impacted by the thousands of people attending the festival. The prairie dog colony next to WCR 26 on the southeast side of the reservoir has a history of providing habitat for burrowing owls. Although these small owls did not return to this particular colony in 2009; they could return 2010. Collisions with vehicles have been cited as a significant source of mortality for these low flying birds. If Heaven Fest occurs, 6400 vehicles will pass nearby the prairie dog colony on WCR 26, potentially endangering any returning burrowing owls and other wildlife living in the colony.

Connectivity of habitats and ecosystems is a major principle of modern ecosystem conservation. The connectivity between the reservoir and habitat to the south will be disrupted for at least two weeks by Heaven Fest and may have a long term negative impact on wildlife. The Bald Eagles nesting near the Keyes property will essentially be blocked from important foraging areas at the reservoir. Union Reservoir and St. Vrain/Boulder Creek areas are part of an important regional wintering and breeding area for bald eagles. Do we want to diminish the value of this important ecosystem?

The critical wildlife habitat on the reservoir’s north shore will also be adversely impacted by traffic congestion, noise, dust, and trespassers if this area isn’t closely monitored.

Clearly, Union Reservoir is an environmentally sensitive area and should be off limits to Heaven Fest.

Ruby Bowman

A lot has been written about the economic benefit Heaven Fest will bring to Longmont. $700,000 is a great deal of money, almost too good to be true in today’s depressed economy. I recently reviewed the city’s Heaven Fest economic benefit analysis and found that it is a formula-based analysis, relying on broad assumptions instead of solid information.

One of the assumptions made in the city analysis is that 20% of the 30,000 festival attendees, or 2000 travel parties (consisting of three individuals) will stay overnight in Longmont hotels, generating $406,440 of revenue for lodging and meals. How can Longmont accommodate 2000 overnight travel parties when the City has a total of only 918 hotel rooms, according to Economic Development manager Doug Bene?

In addition, it is difficult to believe a large number of attendees would be willing to spend $100 to $150 per night for a hotel room while 1,823 camping spaces will be available at the Heaven Fest site, with additional campsites at the St. Vrain State Park and other parks in the area. We are currently experiencing one of the worst economic recessions since the Great Depression of the 1930’s. I know from my own experience, when my family budget was tight, we chose to camp under the stars rather than stay at a hotel while vacationing.

According to demographic statistics for the 2009 Heaven Fest event, 42% of the festival attendees had an annual household income of less than $35,000. One can reasonably assume this demographic will be the same for the Longmont Heaven Fest. I expect that many festival goers will not be able to afford a night’s stay in a Longmont hotel. They will most likely take advantage of the less expensive camping sites, or even sleep in their vehicles.

Another assumption in the analysis is that 8,000 day-travel parties will spend $351,840 on meals in Longmont. If the Heaven Fest event had a history of providing a huge economic boost to local economies, as assumed in the analysis, then there would have been a substantial increase in sales revenues in the cities of Brighton and Thornton during the 2009 Brighton Heaven Fest event. There wasn’t.

Finance directors of these two cities have stated there was no noticeable bump in the collection of sales tax from the Brighton Heaven Fest event. This is troubling, since Brighton is only a few miles east of the 2009 festival site. Additionally, an official with the Finance Department of Adams County also told an inquiring Longmont resident that it would be very difficult to attribute any increase in sales tax revenue to the 2009 Heaven Fest.

Edna Loehman

Before deciding that Heaven Fest 2010 will be economically beneficent to Longmont, each side of the balance sheet must be considered.

One important missing piece is the costs related to the use of city resources and manpower to facilitate Heaven Fest 2010.   City officials contend there will be no cost to taxpayers; everything will be paid for by Heaven Fest.  However, the tab is already rising as city staff put in many hours of work on the Heaven Fest project.  The $50 impact fee that Heaven Fest promoter may pay for the city use permit will not cover this cost.

Economic development benefit  due to tourism for this event represents a private benefit.  There are also social costs that may outweigh this private benefits.

One category of social cost is traffic congestion.  This can be estimated.  For example, according to the city’s website, average daily volume on Ken Pratt east of ThirdStreet westbound is about 12,000 cars per day.  On County Line Road north of Third Street southbound, average daily volume is about 7,000 cars per day.  The 17,000 additional cars coming to the event will roughly double the traffic on these two streets.  The additional cars from the event could increase travel time for the average  19,000 cars by half an hour per car/per person on the average.  With two passengers per car, their time, valued at $10 per hour ,results in an estimated social cost of congestion at $380,000.  This is of the same magnitude as tourism benefits and could be much higher if congestion on other roads was included.

Thus, it is likely that in a full accounting, social costs would exceed the private benefits from tourism.

Note that a different location or different traffic/ parking arrangements could result in the same tourism benefit with less social cost.

City officials should do more number crunching to come up with a credible cost/benefit analysis to help identify better options for the Heaven Fest event.   In times of economic uncertainty, Longmont residents need to be assured they will not be subsidizing an event that could potentially draw over a million dollars for the event promoters, but not much for Longmont.

Tom DeMers

We’ve addressed legal requirements described in a number of legal documents. We talked to you about quality of life issues and noise. We’ve talked to you about the environment and wildlife. We’ve talked to you about traffic, congestion and parking.

Although the Use of Public Places does not require an economic benefit, anyone paying attention to this issue from the beginning recognizes that the subject of economic benefit has been the driving force in the approval process. Gary Wheat, Executive Director of LAVA, told the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, “I speak from the standpoint of economic development.”

The policy decision to use Union Reservoir for an event of tens of thousands of people with vehicles, equipment and vendor stations was not made by the city; it was made by LAVA. An decision that there would be enormous economic benefit was made a priori, before the fact. And subsequent to this, everything has been forced to fit or dismissed as inconsequential.

The people of Longmont need to know how we got to this point. They need to know the underlying motivation.

To hold an event of this magnitude is a major policy decision that needs to be made by the City Council, not by LAVA and not by city staff. The time for the City Council to vote on the appropriateness of holding this event at Union Reservoir is NOW. Once a contract is signed, it will not and cannot be rescinded without legal ramifications. Ms. Skitt may issue the permit before the week is out.

We’ve tried to offer you and the public information that has not been considered or has been withheld from public view.

Do you still think this is going to be good deal for Longmont? — We know it’s not.

CAN YOU HEAR US NOW?

Can You Hear Us NOW?

Listen up Mr. Mayor

This is a second update to an earlier article.

This poll question at the TimesCall:

The Longmont City Council offers two “public invited to heard” sessions during each regular meeting — one near the beginning of the meeting and one at the end. Mayor Bryan Baum would like to see the first public-invited segment to be limited to no more than 30 minutes. Speakers already are limited to three minutes each. Should the first public-invited session be limited, and if so, how much time should be allotted?

Looks like the Times-Call finally closed the Limits to Public Invited To Be Heard poll.

Here’s the final results:

(click to enlarge images)

Final tally: 500 votes (not bad based on other polls)

Ratio of ‘No Limits’ to the (obviously hoped-for) 30-minute limit?

3:1 – ouch

I do believe that’s a very, Very, VERY clear statement that the public disagrees with the Mayor about limiting free speech. (and his effort to ‘walk it back’ fooled no one)

So maybe our glorious new mayor should think before he voices his inner thoughts about the public’s right to free speech and ‘stewardship’ since it’s pretty clear he doesn’t have much of a clue about either of them.


Here’s the previous poll results:

Here’s how the voting looked two days ago:

Times call poll as of Jan 29, 2010 at 1:00 AM MDT

Click images to enlarge


Now it’s late in the day sunday Jan 31 and more folks have expressed their opinion:

The number of total votes has gone up from

262 to 376 (over 40% more votes)

114 more citizens spoke up (which is great to see)

click images to enlarge

The opposition to limiting Public Invited To Be Heard to a 30 minute limit compared to no limit has grown from 3:1 to 3.2:1 (look at the charts and you can see the jump:

Samples from 1/29 and 1/31 – note the increase in scale on the charts (click images to enlarge)

I think it’s pretty obvious, even from this admittedly-nonscientific poll, that the people who are paying attention really don’t agree with the idea of limiting Public Invited To Be Heard and suggestions to that effect are not welcome by the public. Any ‘good steward’ of government should be able to see this. I hope this analysis has helped provide more clarity.

How we chose our name

In response to a comment at the Times-Call blarg…er.. blog:

Wray – cute name for your new blog – are we to assume that based on the name, the writers are all just a bunch of chickens? Is this new venture a co-op…or a…wait for it…a coop?
Longmonter, Longmont, CO, 1/21/2010 9:43 AM

Now, normally I don’t talk to non-entities since I like to know who it is I’m talking to, but this is a pretty basic question and I’ll entertain the Lunatic Fringe on this occasion.

Free Range Longmont’s name came about during a discussion of all the right-wing websites that have popped (pooped?) up over the past couple of years (LongmontReport, PercyReport, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum). In particular we noticed FrontRangeChickens.com:

and we felt that the idea of chickens fighting back was actually pretty funny and the idea of ‘free range’ anything was generally pretty good, so it stuck. (side note: Mr. Rodriguez recently chided FRL for it’s use of ‘violent imagery’ – sorry sir, your Lunatic Fringe pals beat us to it long ago.)

Are we a co-op? Hell yah! We have over a dozen writers now and plan to have many more as time goes on. Don’t forget, the 28% turnout in this last election means that only 14% of the voters in Longmont approve of this council – something tells me we can get a substantial fraction of the other 86% activated and durn-right pissed off before the next election. If we can get the turnout back up into the 40% range, something tells me the Lunatic Fringe’s reign of terror will be over as quick as it started.

Are we a coop? Welllll… there are a number of ‘spring chickens’ as well as ‘seasoned hens’ and no shortage of young and old ‘roosters’ so I suppose you could call us a coop… if you’re simply looking for an insult (and it’s obvious you are).

Lastly, in response to ‘Keith H.’ (again, who the hell is this?) who claims I ‘waste the public’s time…’ you make me laugh. You’re another anonymous nobody bloviating endlessly and for all the ‘public’ knows you’re yet another avatar of Chris Rodriguez, Stephanie Baum, Richard Yale or one of the other Lunatic Fringers ‘catapulting the rhetoric’. Go fantasize while listening to Rush, it’s as close as you’ll ever get to your ideal world.

Long Ol’ Row to Hoe

It’s been a long row ta’ Hoe, Now,

From Ducktown to Longmont

& I pray there’s still More yet to come.

I been pushin’ this Plow over hard, stony Ground

Tryin’ ta plant Y’all some Trees an’ some Flowers

‘n’ I’ve seen many cold Dawns

and strode mostly Alone

While I worshipped the Sun an’ the Snow

‘n’ I’ve carried the Story of All I’ve encountered,

& I’m tryin’ ta make sense of it All.

SomeOne gave me a Mission

I been tryin’ ta be True to

As I Plowed every step of the Way –

Yet, my Guides have been scattered

Wearin’ many Disguises

While I’d listen to what they might Say.

SOME spoke Backwards — Some Frontwards

Some Screamed and then Cursed

First at Me then at That which I Love

But I’ve searched for the Meaning

In Whatall I’ve Encountered

As an oft-Cryptic Sign

From Above.

Now, Confusions ha’ plagued me

Many Dangers waylaid me

As I ran up this crooked ol’ Trail

I keep getting’ back Up

From th’ Swamp an’ th’ Muck

Prayin’ Someone might Stand for my Bail.

But the Night has been Long

Stifled many a Song

That my Heart has been longing to hear –

‘n’ I try even now, though I still ain’t learned how

to dispel that Ol’ Demon — my FEAR.

And He keeps right on Lurking —

Crushing all of my Working

For Love Beauty Justice

And Truth.

So my Path kep’ on Windin’

To Escape the Confining

Prison Walls which have Stolen my Youth.

& I Run up the Mountain

shout my NAME to the Stars

then return to my hovel a l o n e

Knowing NOTHING is Promised

but to DO What I Came For

and to Stand up an’ Sing You

My SONG.

Strider © 1/17/2008

Letter to the Editor – Firestone Lawsuit

The Longmont City Council recently voted to initiate settlement discussions in its lawsuit against the Town of Firestone. The Firestone lawsuit was and is a hot-button political issue for many people in Longmont.  It concerns Longmont’s willingness to contest the proposed development plans of the Life Bridge Church on property annexed by Firestone, which is so near to the Union Reservoir.

Many folks are disappointed by Council’s settlement decision because we continue to be worried about the impacts of the proposed LifeBridge development on quality of life in Longmont.  For example:

  • The planned Life Bridge development is putting Longmont’s eastern boundary  at risk of being swallowed up into undifferentiated urban sprawl.
  • The planned Life Bridge development would put the equivalent of a new town right on the edge of Longmont’s eastern border.
  • Longmont has a very substantial financial investment in the Union Reservoir and surrounding properties – almost $75 million dollars.  This huge public investment would be negatively impacted by the Life Bridge development and by Longmont’s loss of control over what happens around its properties.
  • The sensitive environmental ecosystem in and around Union Reservoir would be seriously compromised by a development the size of Life Bridge.  This at-risk ecosystem includes bald eagle plus migratory bird habitat.

I am not surprised that the newly elected City council – which now is controlled by a majority of four conservative members who are very pro-development – would vote to settle the Firestone lawsuit rather than proceed with it.  That doesn’t mean that we folks who were concerned with the Life Bridge mega-development are any happier with it.  We will be following the settlement negotiations and continue to make our opinions heard.  The issue isn’t over – it is too important to forget.

Comments to Council 1-5-10

We’ve hearing in the newspaper about the proposed Heaven Fest Christian music concert which – if a City permit will be granted – will be held at the City’s Union Reservoir this July.  Unfortunately, we’ve only been given the rose-colored, glowing “good” side of the story.   As a citizen of Longmont, I am concerned about the potential negative consequences of permitting this event to go forward – or others like it – without a fair and adequate analysis being done of the actual costs and benefits to the City.

Think of it -Heaven Fest is promoting on its website that it will have room this year for more than 50,000 concert goers.  A concert of this magnitude – 50,000 concert goers – would attract to our small city for a multi-day event, a clientele whose population would almost double the population of our City.  This is no small matter – it is huge.  I am very concerned that our City is rushing into this permitting process, without having given enough thought to the potential negative consequences.

For instance, has anybody in the City contacted the City of Boulder and found out why the Kinetics Races, which had been held in Boulder and had attracted huge crowds similar to those expected by Heaven Fest – was no longer happening in Boulder?   Has anybody found out what the actual costs of the Kinetics Races were to the City of Boulder, such as the police, cleanup, or power-related expenses, as well as finding out what the quality-of-life and environmental impacts had been?  Similarly, has anybody from the City of Longmont gotten an opinion from the Division of Wildlife or other bona fide wildlife expert, concerning what the possible negative effects on wildlife and plant life might be, of placing such a huge amount of people into the environmentally-sensitive Reservoir?

These are serious questions – and I don’t think they have been adequately analyzed yet.  Even larger questions than these, I believe are not being addressed.   These are: do the citizens of our small town really want to be deluged by crowds as large as those expected at Heaven Fest, and do they really want our recreation areas to be turned over to huge commercial ventures?  I, personally, have serious reservations about these kind of ventures being held on our public lands, and I imagine others do to.  Yet such concerns are not even being mentioned, much less being addressed.

So I urge Council and the City to slow down the freight train here, and give much more adequate consideration to whether the huge Heaven Fest event is an appropriate event for our City.  I am not convinced that it is.

Remarks I shared at Longmont City Council on 1/12/10

Earlier today I attended the Martin Luther King celebration in these chambers. The City put together a beautiful and inspirational program. When I looked at the posters of MLK and President Obama together, I felt both hopeful and melancholy. Hopeful to think of how far we’ve come, and melancholy as I realized how far we still need to travel to end discrimination… As my friend Strider reminds me, “It’s a long march.”

While that’s not what I came to speak about, I was inspired. See, I too have a dream. My dream is to keep Union Reservoir Wild. This dream started in 2001, when the City of Longmont had a contract on 315 acres at Union for Open Space. Due to a glitch in the contract, the landowner was able to get out of this contract when Lifebridge Church doubled the offer the City had made.

I was on a organized bird walk at Union 10 days ago where we saw 7 bald eagles, 2 golden eagles, 2 norther harriers, 1 coyote, 2 foxes and a flock of about 100 horn larks. All this is 70 minutes. Union Reservoir and the wildlife it supports and surrounding land is precious and needs protection.

My ultimate dream is that Lifebridge has a change of heart and decides to sell this land back to the city to be kept wild as was the original plan.

My new short term dream is that the organizers of Heavens Fest realize the incredible jewel Union Reservoir is and rethink the location of their event. I was thinking Main Street would be far superior for the following reasons: 1) They know hoe to do large festivals–accommodating 20,000+ people. Extending a couple blocks might be necessary if there will be 35,000+ people.
2) There is regional and local RTD services to Main Street and from Main Street all over Longmont. 3) Downtown businesses would get an economic boost and lots of great exposure. Frankly, Union attenders would travel east, north, south in addition to those that might come west into Longmont. A more central location increases the likelihood of dollars staying here. 4) The Main Street location would not have a negative impact on Land & wildlife. 5) Shuttles could be arranged from the fairgrounds etc. to offset parking.

Heaven Fest maybe a good idea. It’s just not a good location.