Tag Archive for Dean Lehman

Longmont’s ALEC impersonators

The following address was presented to the Longmont City Council at its July 26, 2011 meeting.


Big money crushing the little people

ALEC. No, not Alex with an X; ALEC with a C

It’s a acronym. It stands for the American Legislative Exchange Council – a secretive front group of hundreds of corporations that are investing millions of dollars a year to write business-friendly legislation at the expense of the middle class, the working class and those in poverty.

ALEC develops and distributes model bills to state elected officials, with the intent those bills be passed in as many state legislatures as possible. ALEC has drafted more than 800 model bills for state legislators, including efforts to privatize everything from schools to prisons, to weaken workers’ rights, and to make it more difficult for citizens to vote,

ALEC develops model bills in task forces where only private business interests and legislators participate. Sound familiar?

ALEC is lobbying in state capitals across the country, all while claiming to the Internal Revenue Service that they are a charitable organization. By claiming to be a charity and calling participating legislators “members,” ALEC attempts to evade disclosure of its lobbying, allows corporate members to deduct their payments as charitable contributions rather than non-deductible lobbying expenses, and does an end-run around state ethics laws.

Longmont, a local home rule municipality, doesn’t have this level of sophistication. Nonetheless, the corporate business interests in this community and in surrounding communities are engaging in very similar practices. They only need to place a phone call to a like-mined council member, schmooze at the Chamber or the Rotary, and contact sympathetic staff members. And the results are fundamental ordinance changes that remove policies that benefit the environment and the community in general and replace them with ordinances that benefit a corrupt ideology and the bank accounts of developers, realtors and all of the businesses aligned accordingly.

The Longmont City Council has:

  • Eliminated Inclusionary Zoning and, as a consequence, has damaged irreparably the city’s Affordable Housing Program and the interest of not only future participants but those of current participants.
  • Eliminated storm water provisions knowing full well, and taking pride in the fact, that the State of Colorado lacks the resources to assure compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency requirements. In some cases, these permits have been reduced from $2000 to $50. Staff and certain council members are at risk of breaking their arms as they pat themselves on the back over this one.
  • And then there are the lawsuit settlements that have transferred nearly $200,000 of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of their ideological allies – Scott Gessler, LifeBridge Church, and Dean Lehman’s Times- Call.

There are other ethical affronts, but three minutes is insufficient to name them all. It’s a crying shame that Longmont has stooped so low and joined in principle with the likes of ALEC.

What’s up, Times-Call?

Still playing at power in his shrinking web?

Somebody over there is on a mission. Is that you, Deanie? I understand that you’re still in charge. While I’ve seen much that I would describe as improvements since Prairie Mountain became your boss. I suppose we won’t really see a “change we can believe in” until your time is up at the newspaper.

Back to the issue of the moment.

It appears that certain members of the Longmont community have hired you, reporter in tow, to serve as their lobbying firm, or at least their publicity agent. Come now, don’t scratch your head. It’s your first real flashback to the old Times-Call ways since the paper changed hands. (By the way, where’s dad?)

OK, OK, here it is. Or should I say, here they are?

“Push on for Longmont-based district”
Three local layers have joined the call for a state panel to put most of Longmont into a single state House district when new maps are drawn for the Legislature’s House and Senate. (John Fryar, 07/17/2011)

“Local lawyers urge adoption of a Longmont-based House district”
Three local lawyers have joined the call for a state panel to put most of Longmont into a single state House district when new maps are drawn for the Legislature’s House and Senate district (John Fryar, 07/16/2011)

“Longmont-area critics of current legislative map take beefs to reapportionment panel”
A contingent of Longmont-area residents urged the Colorado Reapportionment Commission on Monday to correct last decade’s mistakes in creating state House Districts (John Fryar, 7/12/2011)

“Longmont Chamber of Commerce complains about House boundaries”
The Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce has urged the Colorado Reapportionment Commission to include most of Longmont in a single House district in the state Legislature (John Fryar, 7/12/2011

“Reapportionment panel hears from Longmont-area critics of legislative map”
A contingent of Longmont-area residents urged the Colorado Reapportionment Commission on Monday to correct last decade’s mistakes in creating state House districts (John Fryar, 07/12/2011)

“Reapportionment panel charged with remapping state legislative districts”
The 86,270 people counted as living in Longmont in the 2010 census have once again made the city too large to fit within a single Colorado House district. (John Fryar, 07/08/2011)

“Longmont chamber may seek a voice in redrawing political boundaries”
Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce members are looking into possible ways to ensure that this community’s interests will be considered when congressional and sate legislative districts are redrawn(John Fryar, 01/08/2011)

Wait a minute! Wait a minute! Some of these are duplicates.

Yep. Times-Call wanted to be sure you didn’t miss it; so on some occasions they posted the article online on two separate days with two different titles and IDs.

Lest you think there is some groundswell of support for the Chamber/Longmont-one-seat agenda, keep in mind that those who showed up to “testify” at the Colorado Reapportionment Commission are Chamber members and/or sympathizers, as are the emailing “three local attorneys,” one of which is the Chamber president (Rick Samson).

It has been pointed out to the Chamber that Longmont is much more than the Chamber and its member businesses. But that’s a Chamber irrelevancy and is only given lip service when the Chamber is otherwise embarrassed.

If you like that Longmont has TWO Colorado House representatives instead of ONE, if you want to keep it that way, if you think that your voice is every bit as important as the Longmont Area Chamber of Commerce, then the Reapportionment Commission needs to hear from you, too. You can reach them by email at: reapp2011@state.co.us

Rail Park in Longmont: $$$ LifeBridge

Address to Longmont City Council, January 11, 2011:

You have before you tonight a City Council Communication on a Rail-Served Industrial Business Park. While portions of this communication are not inaccurate, they are far from the full and true story.

City staff is promoting the use of properties south, southwest and southeast of Union Reservoir for use as a massive, several hundred acre industrial park served by a rail line. Much of the property in question was purchased by LifeBridge Church and/or its elders and high-ranking members.

The collapse of the residential and commercial markets have left LifeBridge and company with near-dead options for their land speculations on our eastern border. Apparently some members of city council and like-minded members of city staff now think that a Rail-Served Industrial Park is an excellent idea to get LifeBridge’s fat out of the fire.

Parcels identified as being owned by the Highway 119 Holdings LLC are true on their face, but they are at the very least misleading. Highway 119 Holdings LLC is an entity established by Church Development Fund to “hold” the properties it acquired from LifeBridge as deeds in lieu of foreclosure. Let me repeat that: DEEDS IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE.

The Times-Call wrote an article almost a year ago about the LifeBridge Church and its properties both off Highway 66 and in southwest Weld County. As water carriers for LifeBridge, the Lehmans framed this as something other than deeds in lieu of foreclosure. WRONG. For those like me who have taken the time to read and analyze the Prospectus available to Church Development Fund investors, it is in black and white. These properties were taken to avoid legal foreclosure and to refinance the mortgages on the existing church and adjoining properties. The Fund will be holding them until such time as LifeBridge or others can make money and expand Dominionism.

Beyond this, Union Reservoir and its vicinity is a unique Longmont geographical and topographical feature. It is valued by the community for its environmental and wildlife character and its low impact recreational opportunities.

Please — Knock it off. I’ll be darned if I want to see this community that I now call home and expect to call home for the remainder of my life denigrate its unique resources for the sake of speculators making money.
And while we’re at it, show us the work product of the Firestone/Longmont Intergovernmental Agreement. Much of the property identified is either officially annexed into Firestone or is on target to be official. Pull back that curtain now and show the public what’s going on behind it.

If you can demonstrate that the market will support an industrial rail park in Longmont, by all means consider it. But do it for the right reasons. You have other land options. Focus on those and leave the area around the Union Reservoir alone.

Times-Call – on a diet

Bloated and struggling, the Times-Call appears to be on a diet

The weight loss has been slow and subtle so you may not have noticed. And, of course, many of you who read Free Range Longmont stopped subscribing to the Times-Call years ago. You may or may not even visit the local “fishwrap” (as one of our editors frequently describes it). Even the online version has lost weight, with the notable exception of the persistent posters who live in an alternative universe.

A trek through the Larimer County website shows no change in ownership. The Loveland Politics blog, a veritable gossip website at least about the Lehmans, suggests that Media News Group may have even walked away from the deal.

However, there are signs of Singleton both in print and online. One method Dean Singleton, CEO of Media News Group, uses is to piggyback his reporters. That’s now more visible at the Times-Call. Another method is to reduce the representation of print articles in the online version of a paper. This, too, is happening with some degree of frequency by the Times-Call. And even when an article does appear online, it may not be the complete article.

And, of course, the paper is getting skinnier – as in the number of pages. The number of Times-Call reporters is dwindling. And if it weren’t for Associated Press, McClatchy Newspapers, Bloomberg News, and an assortment of syndicated columnists and editorials and other borrowings from assorted newspapers, the Times-Call would be even skinnier.

The freebies it receives in the form of letters to the editor and guest opinions plus the inanity that shows up on T-C Line also fill local space. Local obits round things out, but, hey, they are paid for by the “next of kin.”

Such is the story of a hometown newspaper whose diet has gone sour.

The Times…, they are a changing?

Is time running out for the Times-Call?

Rumors abound lately that the Longmont Daily Times-Call newspaper is about to be sold. Those in the know are mum about the matter. But there’s enough to suggest that, indeed, the Times (or the Times-Call) they are a changing.

The newspaper business has not been fairing well. According to the Newspaper Association of America, daily newspaper readership peaked in 1984 at 63.3 million. By 2008, daily circulation had dropped more than 20 percent to 48.6 million. Since 2000, newspapers have also seen a precipitous decline in advertising revenues. A University of California Davis study reports that advertising revenue, adjusted for inflation, was lower in 2008 ($38 billion) than in every year since 1975. According to the study, figures for 2009 are likely to be similar to those of 1965.

Faced with changes of this magnitude in the newspaper publishing business, the 2008 $20 million investment made by Lehman Communications Corporation and Western L, LLC (also a Lehman company) in the Longmont Printing Center in Berthoud is likely a severe financial drain.

As an alternative to publication in the Times-Call, in 2009 the City of Longmont investigated the possibility of placing its notices of ordinances and other official actions on its website with hard copies at select locations around the city in order to reduce city expenses. Dean Lehman appeared before council on several occasions to plead the case to continue publication in the Times-Call. However, that change would have required either modifications in state legislation or a local ballot measure. No further action was taken; and as a consequence, the Times-Call saved some of its advertising revenue.

In February, the Longmont Ledger reported that the bank that holds the loan on the Longmont Printing Center demanded a cut in debt. These demands resulted in the consolidation of three weekly papers in Louisville, Lafayette and Erie into a single weekly now known as the Colorado Hometown Weekly.

The quiet layoffs, attritions and consolidations over the past two years seem to be inadequate to stem the financial stresses on the Times-Call in this declining economy struggling towards an uncertain recovery.

It is well understood in the Longmont community that the Lehmans and their newspaper have carried the water for those in Longmont with long-standing economic and political interests, whether or not these interests have been in the best interest of the community as a whole.

Should the Times-Call change ownership as rumored, it is hoped that a new publisher will demand a healthier distance between the paper’s management and editorial staff and Longmont’s “special interests.” More substantive and investigative reporting would also be welcomed. These changes would likely boost the paper’s circulation and advertising revenues.

The History of Longmont Times-Call and the Lehman Communications Corporation

Edward and Ruth Lehman and others formed the Times-Call Publishing Company on January 30, 1957. Their vision was astonishingly ambitious. While their primary purpose was to publish a newspaper, they also planned to become publishers of journals, magazines, books and other literary works. Their original Articles of Incorporation even indicate that they hoped to acquire licenses or franchises for “operating AM or FM radio stations, television transmissions or any other means of transmission or communication…” On February 1, 1957 they purchased Longmont Times-Call.

Over the years, there were numerous mergers and acquisitions. In May 1967, the Times-Call merged with the Loveland Reporter-Herald and in 1978 it purchased the Canon City Daily Record. On December 30, 1986, the three publishing companies (Times-Call, Loveland and Royal Gorge) became Lehman Communications Corporation, a Lehman-family company.

Lehman Communications continued to grow. In 1985 the Times-Call added a Sunday edition and became a seven-day-a-week newspaper. In 1988 it doubled its size to 22,500 square feet. The Louisville Times, Lafayette News and the Erie Review were purchased in June of 1997 and in 1998 the Times-Call converted to morning delivery.

As the Loveland Reporter was growing into larger facilities, land in Berthoud, Colorado, was purchased (1993) in anticipation of a potential new printing facility. It wasn’t until 2007 that the decision was finalized to build the Lehman Printing Center in Berthoud.

Documents filed with the Larimer County Recorder indicate that on June 10, 2008, the Ruth Lehman Trust sold the vacant land to Western L, LLC for $429,393. Western L is managed by Ed Lehman. On August 1, 2008, Western L borrowed $6,686,987 from Wells Fargo. The Deed of Trust matures on August 15, 2013.

To secure the loan Lehman Communications became Western L’s tenant, agreeing to lease the new facility annually for a basic rent of $990,000. Lehman Communications is responsible for “additional rent” by assuming all other expenses in connection with operating, maintaining and securing the facility. Its 10-year lease began on February 1, 2009 and has a five-year extension option.

The 60,000 square foot facility with its state-of-the-art equipment is an investment totaling about $20 million with loans from Wells Fargo, Lehman Communications and Ed and Dean Lehman.

Addendum 12/1/2010 in response to comments

There were a number of “sources” for this article.  They were sufficient number, variety and credibility to justify presenting the matter for public consumption.  However, because much is riding on the outcome of the sale of the Times-Call, “facts” were left intentionally vague.

The irony is that the precise reason for the Lehmans’ financial stress, the construction of the new printing facility, is the reason that the paper is attractive to a potential buyer.  In published reports Dean Singleton has expressed a desire to upgrade the printing capabilities of his papers, and clearly the Berthoud Printing Center will do that.  It also was designed for future expansion.

This writer expects no panacea from the new owner.

Singleton has flirted with outsourcing some newspaper functions, but apparently has abandoned that approach in favor of consolidating staff, as one commenter alludes.  Whether the Lehmans have trimmed enough staff that additional cuts will not be necessary remains to be seen.  Whoever is left standing or assigned from other Media News Group papers, it is hoped that they will be able to report on Longmont issues without the spoken and unspoken editorial bias of Ed and Dean Lehman.  That, too, remains to be seen.

Singleton has been appropriately described as rabidly anti-union.  Since the Times-Call is not unionized, this will not be a factor should the purchase occur.  However, Singleton’s stance on unions undoubtedly influences his political perspectives.

Singleton appears to be somewhat eclectic in his political endorsements, having contributed to both Republicans and Democrats.  His expressed opinions indicate that he prefers seasoned politicians over newcomers because of the political clout that comes with seniority.  He rubs elbows with conservatives such as Philip Anschutz and moderate Democrats such as Bill Ritter and John Hickenlooper.

Profiling Singleton without knowing him, it appears that he is motivated by power as much as by money, if not more so.  One breeds the other in a chicken/egg manner.

Reports indicate that he envisions a new “model” for newspapers in the digital age, one that expects consumers to pay for part of their online coverage.  This is already the case with the Times-Call.  Local readers must subscribe to the print edition for some of the coverage, particularly the Opinion Page.  Singleton’s model is no sure thing for the newspaper industry, but he certainly is not timid, either in his vision or his acquisitions.

The holding company, Affiliated Media Inc., emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy earlier this year.  Singleton remained at the helm but with 89% of the privately-held company in the hands of his lenders.  That split was in return from a debt reduction from $930 million to $165 million.  The stock arrangement allows Singleton to retain voting control and the selection of the majority of the board of directors.

William Dean Singleton
AP – Chairman; MediaNews Group – founder, CEO

NEWSMEAT Power Rank: 442

Election Picks: 7 wins, 2 losses

$500Special interest