Tag Archive for Longmont Affordable Housing Program

Housing and hosing

If you can't afford new, you're not allowed to own: Exclusionary zoning.

Well, the city of Longmont has finally rid itself of that pesky inclusionary zoning program. Unintended consequences of that decision are: the inability to leverage private capital necessary to build work-force housing; the inability to finance needed repairs such as roof replacement on a family rental property or an elevator replacement on a senior housing project; and limited ability to support the purchase of lots by Habitat for Humanity.

As a six-year member of the city’s Affordable Housing Technical Review Committee, I reviewed real projects like those above that were supported by the city’s Affordable Housing Fund financed through the inclusionary zoning program. During that period, thousands of frail elderly, handicapped and persons in low-paying jobs benefited from these publicly supported housing investments.

The next time a City Council member hears from a Longmont teacher or a police officer that they have taken a job in Johnstown or Frederick because it’s closer to “home” where the housing is cheaper, I hope they will remember the decision to eliminate the inclusionary zoning program.

The next time a local housing development project misses out on the opportunity to bring millions of dollars in outside investment, (e.g., the Hover Crossing Senior housing project) due to lack of local commitment, remember this decision.

The next time economic development advocates come to the city with reports that lack of work-force housing is a hindrance to attracting new business, remember this decision.

These will be unintended consequences of the elimination of the inclusionary zoning program.

Reconstitute the affordable housing fund through a different funding mechanism. Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water!

Longmont’s ALEC impersonators

The following address was presented to the Longmont City Council at its July 26, 2011 meeting.


Big money crushing the little people

ALEC. No, not Alex with an X; ALEC with a C

It’s a acronym. It stands for the American Legislative Exchange Council – a secretive front group of hundreds of corporations that are investing millions of dollars a year to write business-friendly legislation at the expense of the middle class, the working class and those in poverty.

ALEC develops and distributes model bills to state elected officials, with the intent those bills be passed in as many state legislatures as possible. ALEC has drafted more than 800 model bills for state legislators, including efforts to privatize everything from schools to prisons, to weaken workers’ rights, and to make it more difficult for citizens to vote,

ALEC develops model bills in task forces where only private business interests and legislators participate. Sound familiar?

ALEC is lobbying in state capitals across the country, all while claiming to the Internal Revenue Service that they are a charitable organization. By claiming to be a charity and calling participating legislators “members,” ALEC attempts to evade disclosure of its lobbying, allows corporate members to deduct their payments as charitable contributions rather than non-deductible lobbying expenses, and does an end-run around state ethics laws.

Longmont, a local home rule municipality, doesn’t have this level of sophistication. Nonetheless, the corporate business interests in this community and in surrounding communities are engaging in very similar practices. They only need to place a phone call to a like-mined council member, schmooze at the Chamber or the Rotary, and contact sympathetic staff members. And the results are fundamental ordinance changes that remove policies that benefit the environment and the community in general and replace them with ordinances that benefit a corrupt ideology and the bank accounts of developers, realtors and all of the businesses aligned accordingly.

The Longmont City Council has:

  • Eliminated Inclusionary Zoning and, as a consequence, has damaged irreparably the city’s Affordable Housing Program and the interest of not only future participants but those of current participants.
  • Eliminated storm water provisions knowing full well, and taking pride in the fact, that the State of Colorado lacks the resources to assure compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency requirements. In some cases, these permits have been reduced from $2000 to $50. Staff and certain council members are at risk of breaking their arms as they pat themselves on the back over this one.
  • And then there are the lawsuit settlements that have transferred nearly $200,000 of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of their ideological allies – Scott Gessler, LifeBridge Church, and Dean Lehman’s Times- Call.

There are other ethical affronts, but three minutes is insufficient to name them all. It’s a crying shame that Longmont has stooped so low and joined in principle with the likes of ALEC.

Builders, Baum Squad to kill Affordable Housing Program

The following is a presentation given before the Longmont City Council on April 5, 2011.

The council communication on inclusionary zoning and affordable housing is extremely disturbing.

I examined the chart on page 36, particularly those Final Recorded Plats that were NOT highlighted in Yellow.  These have some probability of being built over the next 18 months.  I focused on those that still have designated affordable units.

Boulder Creek Builders has two of these plats – Kingsbridge and Village at Creekside.  Kingsbridge has 10 designated affordables, Village at Creekside has one.

The Boulder Creek website states, “The Kingsbridge community in Longmont has exceeded sales expectations, garnering 25 net sales and 15 closing in 2010.  Kingsbridge ranks second in gross sales and fourth in net sales for all …townhome communities in the 11-county area, which includes Longmont…. Boulder Creek Builders is number one in all of Boulder County…for total Sales.”

Boulder Creek bought Village at Creekside.  The houses planned are smaller than those already built yet comparable prices expected are higher.

Yeager Farms by Markel Homes has 6 affordables out of a potential build of 53 homes.  According to their website, their prices range from $300,000 to $450,000.  They state, “In the 1990’s, our company gained prominence in the high-end, semi-custom single and multi family niche.…Markel Homes has endured the cyclical nature of Colorado’s homebuilding industry.”

Fox Meadow by Sopris Homes has platted 102 homes in the price range of $560,000 to $810,000 and 5 affordables.

Two other builders with a total of 8 affordables I was unable to locate on the web.

The evidence of this research indicates that these builders do not need a moratorium on their affordable set aside.  They may WANT it; but they do not NEED it.

But Longmont NEEDS affordable housing stock and it NEEDS its affordable housing fund replenished for other affordable programs that do not have a new-construction set-aside.

This moratorium will effectively kill the Affordable Housing Program for the next 18 months.  And I suspect that it is a precursor for terminating the program later.

The information infused into the public consciousness about the Affordable Housing Program through comments on the Times-Call website and perhaps to you in phone calls and emails is erroneous and often totally based on ideology.

As elected representatives, you have a non-partisan responsibility to assist the citizens of Longmont.  That responsibility does not extend to padding profit margins for builders or fattening commissions for realtors.

Please let the better angels of your natures reject a moratorium on a program that is one of the most valuable programs in stabilizing the greater community of Longmont.